Monday, May 12, 2008

The Brown envelopes begin

Now that they know the writing is on the wall it would seem that the caretaker apparatchiks of the UK's Labour party are beginning to cash in their chips before they lose control of the train set; just check out the details of this Torygraph article or flick through the Fisk below:

One of Labour's biggest donors is behind a project to build a 15,000-home eco-town, The Daily Telegraph can disclose.
D'ya think there might possibly be oodles of cash in this if someone could overcome all of the usual regulatory hurdles to then build thousands of new homes on currently agricultural land?

The Co-operative Group is bidding to build an eco-town called Pennbury on land it owns between Stoughton and Great Glen in Leicester.
How very New Labour that it's the Co-operative group; it's almost like some new form of Kibbutzism!

However, objectors are circulating literature pointing out that Labour received £500,000 from the group in 2005/06 and has a £13.5 million overdraft with the Co-operative Bank, an offshoot of the group.
Quelle surprise, monsieur!

The Co-operative Party, which supports the Co-op Group's activities, sponsors 22 Labour MPs, including Ed Balls, the Schools Secretary. Mr Balls is married to Yvette Cooper, who announced the eco-town project to find 15 sites for environmentally friendly towns last year when she was Housing Minister.
This must all be a terrific co-incidence. I'm shocked, shocked to hear that Ed Balls is involved in all of this.

Phil Hope, the minister for the East Midlands – which includes Pennbury – is also sponsored by the Co-operative Party.
Well, 'tis a small world, mon amis.

Kevin Feltham, the chairman of Campaign Against the Stoughton Co-op Eco-Town, has said that the Co-operative Group has had previous applications to build on its land turned down.
Fear ye not; I'm fairly confident that they won't be turned down again.

"How many people realise that the Co-op Group is a major donor to the Labour Party? It really is at this stage that you think of it as sleaze. That's all that one can think, because it stinks," said Mr Feltham.
No, Mr Feltham, calm down. There must be a perfectly rational explanation behind all of this. And I do hope you're not suggesting that a UK government minister would ever do anything improper with regard to personal gain? That would be a foul calumny.

Grant Shapps, the shadow housing minister, said: "When you consider that this application has already been rejected, it is surprising to see it come back into the list of 15.
Personally, I'm bowled over.

"It is not surprising that local people are starting to draw conclusions from the obvious connections between the Co-op Group and the Labour Party."
I'm confident you will find that the plans for this have been made fully available in the filing cabinet downstairs, in the locked cellar, behind the picture of the leopard.

A Co-operative Group spokesman said: "Our plan for an eco-town is on the shortlist for one reason alone – because we have successfully demonstrated to the Government that we can meet the criteria...
...And that we have bought all of the smeggers hook, line, and sinker, and we'll cut them all off at the knees if they forget which side of the bread their butter is located.

"We have discussed our proposals with local MPs – both Labour and Conservative. We have not, however, held any meetings to discuss them at ministerial level, [with] Phil Hope or otherwise."
Or telephone calls, or dinner parties, or strolls in the park. God forbid, no.

In the fine words of the late great Terry Thomas; what an absolute shower.

Pay up or else

If the Mafia ran Britain, what kinds of things would you expect to see? Well, I would expect to see advertising along the lines of "pay up your protection money, peasant, or we'll break your legs".

Which brings us to the current UK government advert above, which threatens people that if they don't pay their road tax (which can now be up to £385 pounds a year), then their cars will be stolen from them and put into a crusher; I suppose if their legs were still inside at the time, then so be it.

This advert probably tells you all you need to know about socialism and democracy. It demonstrates aggressive threat, senseless destruction, property theft, and massive overcharging, all in one fell swoop (about one tenth of road taxation is spent on roads, almost always on wasteful government pork contracts).

In short, all the hallmarks of the mafia are right there, in your face, and there's absolutely nothing you can do about it - Capice?

OK, so this much we know, that government is nothing more than a tenacious long-lived mafia. You wouldn't be reading an Austro-centric web site if any of this was a shock; though personally I still find it interesting that an organisation which typically goes around pretending to be everybody's favourite bumbling uncle, can still occasionally slip into revealing its true personality.

But having said that, why is Gordon Brown still running these government "heavy-threat" adverts, in his personal time of crisis? When New Labour was 10% ahead in the polls, perhaps the Orcs on the outer turf still felt comfortable going around threatening to break everyone's legs. However, now that the Labour party is currently suffering its worst poll figures of all time, you would have thought that Sauron would have ordered his goblins to start kissing up to the proles, rather than still making leg-breaking threats if they fail to defenestrate their wallets on a regular basis?

It's not possible, is it, that Gordon is beginning to lose control of his swarms of minions? I should coco.

The coronation of Capofamiglia David Milliband thus comes ever closer. When he is crowned, expect this kind of government soul-window advertising to stop. Immediately.

Thursday, May 08, 2008

The death-heads couldn't take it

Despite quite clearly being the perfect example of an unfalsifiable hypothesis, it would seem someone couldn't handle my Wikipedia addition of 'Global Warming' to the page on falsification. Oh dear, poor loves.

They couldn't even edit it. They just had to delete it. Oh well, if you destroy the truth it will go away forever. Apparently.

Well, when I get bored or the numbers of these hive drones overwhelm me, they'll probably get their way, but for now, let's add it again, and see how long it takes this time before the moronic death-heads of environmentalism remove it, once again proving that they can't stand the truth or even have the intellectual strength to suffer just a single person doubting them.

Pathetic.

UPDATE: It would appear I was perhaps a little heavy-handed in my comments above, for which I must apologize. What really happened was that because of my lack of knowledge of the Wikipedia paradigm, I had rather unfortunately failed to obey about 9 of the their 10 central editing commandments. Thus chastised, and having gained a Wikipedia login and having signed up to the 10 commandments, I tried repeatedly to update the piece, and in a Marxian dialectic the piece has thus been whittled down to three magnificent lines, which appear to be tolerable to the gathered Wiki crowd. OK, so it's not what I would have wanted, but at least it's still on the page, albeit in reduced form, and it isn't being mauled any more. Crikey, those Wiki people have created a heck of thing. Now that I'm partially involved with it, I'm even more amazed than I used to be. I still think their 'Falsifiability' page needs more on Global Warming, and I'm rather suspicious as to the motives of those I was involved with in this dialectical struggle, but I can tolerate the compromise.

Tuesday, May 06, 2008

The four horsemen of socialism

I wrote a review of Ron Paul's The Revolution: A Manifesto the other day, and it was only afterwards that it struck me how my unconscious mind had slipped in a reference to the four horsemen of the apocalypse. I wondered if there was anything behind this, so I investigated these four famous equestrian figures on the Wikipedia web site, and stumbled over the realisation that the pale horse of death is so named because the translation of "pale", from the Greek, is kloros; this can also be translated as green (as in chlorine gas). Like a thunderbolt from the almighty Zeus, I realised that not only is this the perfect colour for death, as used in the Harry Potter novels for all things associated with death such as Slytherin house, the avada kedavra curse, and anything else connected with Voldemort, it is also the blessed colour of the ecomentalists, the same group who want us all to die so that the world can be left in peace to polar bears, blue whales, and magic mushrooms.

In a fit of ribaldry, I wondered whether I could associate any other key emblems of socialism with the other three horses.

The red horse of war proved fairly uncomplicated. This is the horse of imperialism, aggressive attack, pre-emptive war, and the tens of millions of people either killed or displaced from places such as Vietnam, Iraq, or the forthcoming war against Iran.

The black horse of famine is also fairly easy to pin down, as this has always been the horse of scarcity, as represented in the modern age by recurring recessions brought on deliberately by central bank fiat paper inflationists, to cause things such as the recent global food and fuel riots, also associated with the deathly yoke of ecomentalist legislation in areas such as biofuel regulation.

However, it is the white horse which caused me the worst problem, because although we associate the white horse with plague, throughout history the white horse has also been associated with goodness. Just think of Gandalf on Shadowfax, or the white knight on his white charger, or even the White Horse of Uffington, which perhaps represents an early form of the pan-european god Poseidon. (The image of white horse waves crashing on a beach may help if you're trying to get the nautical link there between Poseidon and white horses.)

Any readers of the White Goddess, by Robert Graves, will also know that the three basic colours of the matriarchal Mother Earth/Moon goddess, are red, white, and black, with her sacred beast also being a white horse. (With horse-shoes representing the crescent Moon and the colour white representing milk, the primary foodstuff of humanity - a gift from the matronly aspect of the full white moon goddess - with a crescent-shaped hunting bow also generally associated with the Goddess riding a white horse, this time in her maidenly aspect. The tie to red is that the Moon goddess menstruates in the same period of most women, with the word men-struate (or moon-struate) coming directly from the word moon, which also tangentially gives us the word "measure", for measuring the twenty-eight day Moon cycle, perhaps the first measured period of time after a single day; also of course giving us the word "month" (or moonth). The tie to black, is that this is the colour of the Moon when the old crone Moon disappears for three days at the end of each moonth before being re-born as the new Moon. Confused yet? Try reading the White Goddess.)

By this point I was nearly as mentally frazzled as you may have been reading that last paragraph. What could both be good and bad at one and the same time, both representing bounty and plague in one and the same breath? (You may be ahead of me on this one.) How could I finish my apocalyptic quadrumvirate of socialist emblems?

But with hindsight, how could it have taken me so long? For the white horse of plague must obviously represent "welfare", a morally corrupting blight often seen as good even by people who ought to know better, but always a terrible plague which ultimately causes even deeper poverty, both of the spiritualist kind and of the materialist kind.

I was finished in my quest.

Or was I? For what about the fifth horse? What about the apocryphal horse of Chaos (or Kaos)? What about this black Pratchettian horse who glows slightly red and who accompanies Death in the novel, Thief of Time?

Easy-peasy, lemon squeezy, kemo-sabe. For Chaos represents the inability of socialism to calculate.

Monday, May 05, 2008

Global warming deniers - It's time to come out of the closet

Unlike the ecomentalist fanatics who plague our planet, I usually only spend about thirteen nanoseconds a day thinking about environmentalism; the rest of the time I waste on living. So having been forewarned that I may get hit by an army of ecomentalist trolls, who spend every breathing moment obsessing about their religion, I thought I better get some ammunition in to fire back at them when they try to hit me with the appalling pollutive rubbish Stephen Schneider et al have been pumping into the metasphere over the last thirty years.

If you too are hiding your global warming denier status under a bushel, for fear of the unpleasantness of being attacked by these ravening hordes of mindless 'Anthropogenic Global Warming' trolls, and want to fight back because you too think it's all a load of old cobbolds, then fear ye not, for AngloAustria is here. Work your way through the following articles below to immunize yourself against all of their total utter nonsense. Many of the pieces are by Uncle George Reisman, which is an absolute godsend because of his high academic standard, but there's plenty of other good stuff in this list too. Enjoy:

ENVIRONMENTALISM IS RECYCLED COMMUNISM AND NAZISM
A Word to Environmentalists
The Nature of Environmentalism
The Green Recession
Sorry to ruin the fun, but an ice age cometh
The Environmentalists Are Trying To Frighten the Natives
Standards of Environmental Good and Evil: Why Environmentalism Is Misanthropic
Two Ice Ages, With Up to 16 Times the Carbon Dioxide in the Atmosphere
Britain’s Stern Review on Global Warming: It Could Be Environmentalism’s Swan Song
IS THERE A PROBLEM? BLAME GLOBAL WARMING
Green Idiocracy

And if all of that lot doesn't inoculate you from the madness, then hop on over to Greenie Watch, which although sometimes a little less academic than the stuff above, is still lots of fun. I bet the Greenies just hate it! Just like they hate most other things, especially anyone enjoying themselves, the poor misbegotten hair-shirted self-flagellating buggers.

I must say though that in many ways it was a good thing that one of the self-appointed chief bees from the AGW hive threatened me with his liccle army of worker trolls the other day, because without this stimulus I would have missed out on all of the above and in particular, I would never have otherwise come across Greenie Watch, which from now on will be part of my regular viewing schedule. So thanks, wadard, you made my day. Next time I fly down to Sydney, be sure to look me up in the Four Seasons hotel down at circular quay; they do a cracking steak and chips, which is worth flying 24,000 miles for just to taste the basil sauce.

(Apparently, because I'm an AGW denier, I must automatically be part of the evil fossil-fuel funded global conspiracy, natch. Well, if anyone out there in the evil fossil-fuel funded industry would like to take some time out from making money on the carbon quotas derivatives market to send me a large cheque, or even a small one, please get in touch. With a recession looming here in England, caused by a combination of socialist central bank planners and ecomentalist regulators, I could do with the bunce.)

Manifesto for a world revolution

The following piece should have popped up on Amazon.co.uk, as the first UK review for Ron Paul's The Revolution: A Manifesto:

As a Republican presidential candidate, Ron Paul is understandably a man concerned primarily with the United States, rather than with England or the rest of Europe. However, the ideas expressed in his book, The Revolution: A Manifesto, can be globally applied given a preliminary understanding of the original American revolution and the later construction of the US constitution. The world is suffering from a surfeit of statism, posits the Good Doctor; we have exploding financial bubbles, endless wars, dissolving currencies, and diminishing civil liberties, racing like the four horsemen of the apocalypse across the entire world. With astonishing clarity, Ron Paul exposes how these inter-linked beasts are related and how they can be tamed via the use of a simple ingredient the United States once used to believe in; freedom. The Republicrats of America must hate him for exposing their carefully spun fallacies behind central banking, foreign policy, fiat currency, and the welfare/warfare state. So, if you want to understand what is going wrong in the world and how it can get fixed then you must read this book, especially if you want to know what America should do to become the beacon of hope it once used to be, rather than the imperial aggressor it has unfortunately become. Personally speaking as a Rothbardian anarcho-capitalist, and a follower of Professor Hans-Hermann Hoppe, I feel that the Good Doctor places a little too much reliance on the ability of any constitution to restrain any government. However, he has written a beautifully crafted piece of work which it is possible to read in one sitting, despite its comprehensive coverage of the entire remit of western world government. The text will also help you understand the basic tenets of Austrian economics, a political philosophy based upon peace, prosperity, and freedom, which may help you remove any scales of state indoctrination from your eyes, if you feel inflicted with the fuzzy feeling that somebody has been hiding the truth from you, for most of your life, about how governments really work. In brief, I believe this book could help save the world as we know it. I hope it does and I hope this review has done it the truly magnificent justice it deserves. Go Ron Paul.

Sunday, May 04, 2008

Heat being turned up on global warming fanatics

Another excellent article by Christopher Booker on the sham that is Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW).

Watch the web for climate change truths

Let us pray that the tide is finally turning and that all of the AGW human-haters can now start crawling back into their recycled communist-nazi holes. Though no doubt once they're back in there, they will start cooking up yet another way to kill the rest of us; well, everyone has to have a hobby.

UPDATE: I've got to go out today in my 4x4 to help set up a May day charity fayre, so I would urge any AGW readers to comment on the Telegraph article pages, if they fancy a debate with anyone. I'll try to rejoin you there later, if I get a moment from my pallet hauling activities because, alas, Telegraph comment trolling is my own particular hobby.

Saturday, May 03, 2008

The Triumph of Bonson Jorris

With Bonson Jorris being elected Mayor of London, which is pretty much a watershed moment for the UK Tory party, I thought now might be a good time to review the political scene in England, via a Fisk of the Torygraph's main article on his victory. (Incidentally, the above photograph was taken several years ago, when Bonson won his candidate election at Benson, in southern Oxfordshire, to go forward for the Henley parliamentary constituency. Why have I used this picture instead of one of the other far more amusing pictures of my soon-to-be-late MP? Because if you look very carefully - and I'm not telling you where - you can see a certain Jack Maturin, or at least a portion of his body, in the said photograph, in Maturin's former days as a stalwart door-knocking Tory. Ah, those were the days...before the good Professor Hoppe interfered with my beliefs in democracy! If I were also to tell you that I was the first person to shake Bonson's hand as he came of the stage that night, that might reveal even more to you about my personal interest in the man's career, however, I digress...)

Boris Johnson is the new London Mayor

Boris Johnson claimed a remarkable victory in the London mayoral contest on Friday night to cap a disastrous series of results for Gordon Brown in his first electoral test as Prime Minister.

As we said a few days ago, Gordon Brown is a dead man walking. Being the political man he is, down to his fingertips, he will know this too. However, the arrogance and the hubris of all politicians will cause him to make the fatal mistake of carrying on. They all think they're special and that the rules don't apply to them. As the most pompous man in England, expect Gordon Brown to continue until he is dragged out of 10 Downing Street, kicking and screaming, just as Blair was, when dragged out by Brown himself. By God, it's a rum business, politics. They really do all deserve each other.

The Conservative candidate's win over Ken Livingstone followed a calamitous showing for Labour at the local elections - the party's worst performance at the polls for 40 years.

Ah, never glad confident May 1997 morning again! It couldn't have happened to a more unpleasant bunch of lizards.

Mr Johnson's landmark victory, a result that would have been almost unthinkable six months ago, was the most symbolic blow to Mr Brown's authority on a day that left the Prime Minister facing the gravest crisis of his leadership.

Bonson winning is the nail in the coffin of Gordon Brown's tenure as UK prime minister. If Livingstone had hung on, Brown would have been cock-a-hoop. However, for the bought-and-paid-for bus driving population of London to kick out their own welfare champion is remarkable. Ink in a Tory election victory in 2010, so long as Brown remains. You will also witness an equally remarkable turnaround in the attitude of the UK press towards the Tory party, even possibly including the BBC. The Westminster village community knows where its bread is buttered, and this comes in the form of getting juicy news scoops from government departments. So if you want those future scoops (and licence fee increases), after seeing Bonson winning you will know what you have to do; start crawling to the future dispensers. Start doing it now.

By taking City Hall, Mr Johnson becomes the first Tory politician to hold a senior role in British politics since the party was swept out of power in 1997. His win provided a significant boost to David Cameron's bid for victory at the next general election.

As earlier, take it for granted. Unless Brown is replaced by Milliband, the only question now is the size of the majority.

In the local elections, Labour lost more than 300 councillors and slumped to a humiliating third place behind the Liberal Democrats in the share of the vote – a full 20 points behind Mr Cameron's Conservatives.

This means we might actually get to see Milliband heading up the socialist crime commission. Many back-bench Labour MPs, who see a future ahead of them of actually having to work for a living if they lose their incumbent seats, will have now lost their fear of Gordon Brown. The knives will be out. Will they plunge them in, though? There is a strong tribalist tendency in the primitive emotion base of the Labour Party, and the taboo of slaughtering the leader may prove too much. However, once one knife goes in, expect a hundred more. It will be a frenzy. If Brown loses his bill to lock innocent people up for 42 days on the whim of a Stasi officer, I predict that is when the frenzy will start.

The results represented a significant breakthrough for Mr Cameron and were the best the Tories have recorded at the polls since John Major won the 1992 general election. If translated to a General Election, it would see the Tories with a Commons majority of more than 100.

Does it really make any difference? There aren't going to be any tax cuts and the country is ruled from Brussels anyway. However, I will welcome it if I am proved wrong. I want tax cuts, the abandonment of ID cards (as promoted by Bonson), and the rejection of the EU constitution (sorry, ratification treaty). Will we get any of this? Well, this is where Bonson might come in. He now holds a lot of power in the Tory party, and he could start pushing them in the right direction. Will he? I doubt it. Once in office, the trappings of power almost always become too tempting to abuse. "Political Reality" also generally bites, and that means the endless pleasing of pressure groups, who are generally pleased by other people being robbed on their behalf. Don't hold your breath.

As one Labour backbencher gave Mr Brown six months to reverse the party's slide or resign, comparisons were made between his Premiership and the dying days of John Major's tenure.

That sounds about right. Oh how I will weep on the day when Brown leaves England. With tears of joy.

The Tories predicted the results marked the beginning of the end of Labour's three terms in Government. On a night of unremittingly bad news for Mr Brown's administration:
  • The Conservatives took a 44 per cent share of the national vote, the Liberal Democrats 25 per cent and Labour just 24 per cent;
  • Labour lost 331 council seats – far beyond even their worst predictions – while the Tories won 256;

What the Tories are forgetting here is that we are living in much more politically volatile times than we have ever lived in before. All the rules have changed and nobody now believes anything any politician says (which is an excellent development). People are also switching political allegiance much more easily than they ever did in the past. One wrong policy on the 10p tax rate, and millions now vote Tory rather than Labour. One Tory MP caught in bed with a horse, and millions will switch back to Labour. The Tories will win the next election easily only if Gordon Brown remains in office. But those back-bencher Labour MPs aren't going to give up their endless days of Chardonnay and free lunches so easily. Expect Milliband in by Christmas. Then we will have a real contest on our hands, with one smoothie up against another smoothie. Cameron must therefore be praying that Brown hangs on. Some might even say, if they were being scurrilous, that it would be in Cameron's interest to cut Brown some slack over the next few months, to help him hang on until it gets too late to replace him. Obviously, I couldn't possibly comment on such shocking rumours.

The Tories made key breakthroughs in the North while Labour was wiped out in the South.

The parasites have killed the host. Now the parasites are also beginning to feel the pinch.

A buoyant Mr Cameron hailed the results as a "very big moment" for the Conservatives, with party strategists likening it to Tony Blair's success in the 1995 local elections, which preceded Labour's landslide election victory two years later.

So come on then David, where are the tax cuts? Where are the regulation cuts? Where are the ID card abandonment plans? Where are the EU severance plans? Just what is the point of you? It is now time for you to start telling us what difference it would make if you were in power. I want less to be stolen from me and I want less intrusion in my life. The more of this, the better. So what are you going to do? The problem for Cameron, of course, is that now he is seen as the next prime minister, he is going to have to start answering questions instead of asking them. Is he up to it? Obviously, as a Hoppeian myself, I know the whole business is ultimately a long-term sham, but I'll take tax and regulation cuts where I can get them in this short-term life. If Cameron remains incapable of delivering them, he will deserve the opprobrium he gets.

"I think these results are not just a vote against Gordon Brown and his government," said Mr Cameron, "I think they are a vote of positive confidence in the Conservative Party.

Well, no. Brown is hated and the Tories aren't hated quite so much as they used to be. That's it. I wouldn't go bandying around words such as "confidence". Tell us something first. Give us something to be confident about. Try these for size: "I will abolish inheritance tax. I will abolish capital gains tax. I will abolish stamp duty tax for both housing and investments. I will abolish corporation tax. I will abolish all forms of taxes on pensions. I will abolish any form of tax on investment interest." OK, let me make this easy for you. Pick three of the above from six. I dare you. I double dare you. With a cherry on top.

"This is a very big moment for the Conservative Party. I don't want any one to think we would deserve to win an election just on the back of a failing government. I want us to really prove to people that we can make the changes that they want to see."

You can virtually always tell what a politician is thinking by examining their negative statements. It's very difficult for the unconscious mind to process negatives and such phrases are almost always windows into the minds of people such as David Cameron. So when he says, "I don't want any one to think we would deserve to win an election just on the back of a failing government," you know that this is exactly what he is thinking. Come on David, try harder please.

George Osborne, the shadow chancellor, said the results were a "very, very good springboard". By 10pm Mr Johnson appeared well on course for victory but he did not manage it on the first preference vote when the result came at midnight.

So it would seem Ken ...errr..., you know, what's his name, Ken ...errr..., Stanley, sorry, Livingbone, anyhow, you know the bloke, managed to make it to the second round. Well done, Ken. It only cost the rest of us billions in stolen pelf handed to all of your client voters in London, but at least it shows they cared.

He was short of the required 50 per cent share, but after the second preference votes were added he was declared winner by 1,168,738 to 1,028,966.

BTW, don't expect Ken to disappear. This odious snake, "liked by everyone but those who know him", in the immortal words of Neil Kinnock, still harbours the ambition of becoming the Labour party's next leader. He won't get it, because Milliband will, but expect him to try, perhaps by helping Brown hang on until Ken can get another parliamentary seat. What else is he going to do? Work for a living? There are far too many attractive political underlings around in need of getting pregnant for that almighty calamity to happen.

Downing Street attempted to blame its catastrophic losses on the economic downturn.

I'm sorry, did I miss something here? Didn't Gordon Brown once claim to have abolished "Boom and Bust"? Surely the Great Decider is not implying that "Bust" is back again? Crikey. Well, if you will go setting yourself up as Lord God Almighty, holding back the waves, expect to eventually get your knees wet. Ho hum.

Mr Brown said: "It's clear to me that this has been a disappointing night, indeed a bad night, for Labour. I said I was going to listen and lead. "We are in difficult economic circumstances. I think people accept that we're going through some of the most challenging times we've seen in many years. The test of leadership is not what happens in a period of success but what happens in difficult circumstances."

I bet all of Brown's enemies in the Labour party are overjoyed this morning, that this slobby wretch of a man is suffering such humiliation. Me? I just want Brown and all other politicians out of my life. I don't want to know who they are. I don't want to know what their plans are for my life. And I don't want them living off my back or telling me what to do. I just want all of them to disappear. So although I'll admit that there is a little unnecessary joy in my heart at the utter demise of Brown, it is tempered by the knowledge that the rest of them are no better.

If the result were repeated in a general election, the swing would potentially unseat seven Cabinet ministers including Ed Balls, the Schools Secretary, Jacqui Smith, the Home Secretary, and James Purnell, the Work and Pensions Secretary.

Oy Vey, so now there's a lot of joy in my heart. Especially if that [words deleted] Ed Balls gets a good drubbing at the next election. My only problem is that I want all of them to lose their seats, whether Tory, Labour, Liberal, or whatever. I would like a solid majority of MPs to be "none of the above". I would even volunteer to lead them in Parliament. My first act would be to burn the 100 volumes of British law, which currently reside on the statute book. My second act would be to burn the 6 volumes of British tax regulation currently foisted upon the rest of us by the Treasury. My third and final wish fulfillment act would be to sack myself. This would be a truly glorious day.

Ministers admitted that Labour had been trounced and needed to "listen more" to people's concerns over the economic turmoil.

Oh, pur...lease. The writing has been on the wall for at least two years, and yet they have still had the arrogance to push through one bad law after another, with every Labour MP signing up to the platform. Now that their salaries, pensions, expenses, and graft are now explicity burning on the line, they finally wake up! C'est Incredible!

The decision to abolish the 10p rate of income tax was blamed for much of the reaction against Labour. Mr Brown is now under intense pressure to try to relaunch his faltering government amid allegations that he is out of touch with the concerns of ordinary people.

This just shows you how much power corrupts. All Labour MPs, I'm sure, start out with the noblest of motives, including Gordon Brown, to "help" the poor. Yes, the answer to really help the poor is to adopt the economic policies of Ludwig von Mises rather than those of Karl Marx, but at least their hearts kick off in the right places. And then 20 years later they find themselves formulating and executing policies deliberately designed to hurt the poorest in society - Que? In many ways it is a tragedy that these people go so wrong in their lives as to end up like this. But not as much of a tragedy as it is for the rest us, of course.

He is expected to unveil detailed policies this month, including plans to help first-time buyers and people who face having their homes repossessed.

Oh God, will the idiocy never end? It is because of such past policies that we are in such a mess. Does nobody in the Labour party have the slightest idea of how economics works?

There will also be significant constitutional changes. Downing Street aides have indicated that they may rethink proposals to sharply increase car tax.

The plan to charge people £500 pounds a year to drive around cars suddenly worth £300 pounds because of these unannounced tax charges, thus preventing them from being able to afford lower-taxed cars, has a certain slight logical flaw in it, don't you think? And the people thus afflicted may not think any of this is a good idea. Is any of this rocket science, guys? You can imagine the conversation in Downing Street: "Damn, the peasants are revolting. They've spotted us fleecing them for no good reason!" However, what's worst about this is the sheer unprincipled nature of it. Either it is good to tax people heavily to use cars because this prevents "global warming" or it is bad to tax them because "global warming" doesn't exist. But to swing between the two policies purely on the expediency of short-term political gain is simply nauseous.

Mr Balls, one of Mr Brown’s closest colleagues, said: "Voters have been cross with us."

D'ya think?

"They think their tax bills are going up, their fuel bills are going up, their food bills are going up. They need to know we are on their side. We have to do more to show we are delivering for families."

Dear Jesus, "think" their tax bills are going up, "think" their fuel and food bills are going up? Mr Balls is obviously living in a different Universe to the rest of us. On our side? No, Mr Balls. At our side, helping yourselves to our exposed wallets. Delivering to families? Surely you mean, delivering the pelf stolen from families into the hands of our clients.

Ian Gibson, a Labour backbencher, set Mr Brown a deadline of this September’s party conference to show that he was the right man to lead Labour into the next election.
He said: "I will give him six months. That takes us up to the autumn conference. If we think that we could lose the next election and we are not moving forward then a lot of people will get rather angry.

As discussed earlier, Cameron must be praying seventeen times a day that Brown makes it past the next Labour party conference. I think it should be all over by then, with Milliband getting the leadership just before Christmas. However, you never know with politics, what with all those snakes in the bag. You just never know which one which will possess the most virulent venom. Well, you do actually - it's Ken Livingbone! He will return. Unless he's caught in mistaken Ugandan discussions with one of his inumerable children.

"If Brown’s the man to do it then he’s got to give us the right policies. Leaders have to listen to the people below them. It is no use trying to make excuses."

Oh please, just stop with the policies. We have 100 volumes of law. Do you really think we need any more? Expect some swingeing attacks on those of us with any money left. In times of crisis the tribal Labour party will almost certainly revert to type.

However, despite many Labour MPs privately admitting that they face general election defeat, there appears little prospect of a serious leadership challenge to Mr Brown. Complicated electoral rules and the lack of a heavyweight challenger make a contest unlikely.

Don't make me laugh. The Tory backbenchers scuttled the Blessed Margaret when they imagined their MP-related directorships going down the pan. When a Labour MP wakes up tomorrow and pictures his life back lecturing in the polytechnic, I think we'll then see a horde of such people capable of removing even the redoubtable Gordon Brown. My money is on Milliband by Crimbo.

The results surprised even the most optimistic Tories. They won control of key target councils in the North, including Bury and North Tyneside.

The Labour party will be back in the north once the host in the south is back on its knees. What we really need is secession. First we let Scotland go free, then Wales, and then the North of England. Let's call this new English country by its old name, "The Danelaw". Within ten years I predict it would be one of the wealthiest countries on Earth, once they are off the morally disastorous pipe of "Angleland" welfare which the Labour party destroyed them with.

Mr Cameron said "the Conservative Party is back in Wales" after advances in the Vale of Glamorgan, Monmouth and Cardiff.

Let's just hope he doesn't appoint John Redwood again as the governor.

The Tories also seized control of Southampton. The last time they controlled the city was in 1984. But they still do not have a significant presence in many northern cities including Liverpool, Manchester, Sheffield and Newcastle.

The welfare pipe was first aimed at all four of these cities, when it was constructed back in the early part of the 20th century, hence why they still can't bring themselves to shake off the socialist habit. Only secession and the cutting of this pipe will enable these four great cities to regain their former glory, which they achieved before the emergence of the Labour party.

Labour announced on Friday morning that it had lost Reading, its last council in the South outside London. However, it retained some ground later by winning Slough.

They can keep it.

Thursday, May 01, 2008

Heads it's global warming, tails it's global warming


An interesting post over at Choice Cuts discussing some tax-funded eco-scientists; they're claiming that if over the next ten years global temperatures go down, stay the same, or go up, it will definitely be global warming to blame.

So, Sir Karl Popper, God rest your Austrian soul, I hereby challenge you to falsify your way out of that one. Good luck!

UPDATE: I have added the following section to the Wikipedia page on falsifiability. I even tried, despite myself, to be even handed! Let's see how long the piece lasts in an un-shredded state before the eco-worshippers get themselves into a frothy lather about it (thus, of course, proving the point).
Global Warming
Both believers and deniers of global warming could also be accused of falling into a Popperian lack of falsifiability and the related Kuhnian trap of the locked paradigm (or in this case, two locked paradigms). In recent years, the theory of global warming caused by mankind has become extremely popular to the point where no matter what evidence is presented, whether on variations in the sun's energy output, or various other ice age volatility models caused by the circulation of the solar system through galactic dust clouds, it generally "proves" global warming caused by mankind to the believers, or "disproves" global warming caused by mankind to the deniers. For instance, to the majority camp of believers, the evidence generally points to global warming caused by mankind, whether the various bodies of factual evidence indicate global warming, global temperature stasis, or even global cooling; the minority denier camp use the exact same evidence to argue the opposite case. Unfortunately, science has become very emotively intertwined in this arena with politics and state funding of science, as well as a whole range politically correct or politically incorrect orthodoxies, both for the global warming believers and the global warming deniers. This whole area may take several decades to unravel with independent Popperian-minded scientists using a falsification-based approach to get to the truth of the matter (or at least, to the least false conclusion).

Wednesday, April 30, 2008

Hope for America


Long may it last! Ron Paul's The Revolution: A Manifesto, right now, is number one for book sales on Amazon.com. Yep, that's right folks, #1 for ALL books on Amazon! So forget J.K.Rowling, J.R.R. Tolkien, Terry Pratchett, Patrick O'Brien, Bernard Cornwell, Conn Iggulden, Stephen King, Dan Brown, Uncle Tom Clancy, and all my other usual favourite schlock pen-pushers, the top author on Amazon (at least for one day), is the Good Doctor himself. Marvellous.

Even now, despite its rapid slide towards fascism, I still see the United States as the best hope for an anarcho-capitalist future, because of its incredible history of sloughing off British statism and instituting a previously unwitnessed level of freedom, 250 years ago.

With Doctor Paul's book going to number one on Amazon, it is evident that despite the invention of state comprehensive schooling and all the other arms of state stupidity that the American government has instituted over the last two centuries, there is still a tremendous beating heart of freedom over there within our blessed colonies, sorry, daughter states, sorry, world hegemonic masters. (Well, at least they still have the most evil baddies in 'Battlestar Galactica' and 'Lost' talking with proper English accents, so good luck to 'em.)

And now, if only we could see one of these fifty states, or even something smaller such as an Indian nation, or even the Alabaman town of Auburn, secede from the monstrous Hamiltonian Leviathan. What a glorious day that will be, should it happen in our life-times. May this book help make this so, and thereby help bring on a truly free world.

My faith and hope in the future is thus renewed and healed once more. Thank you, Doctor Paul.

So come on Amazon.co.uk! Where's my copy?

Tuesday, April 29, 2008

The black hole of British law

Why did the western Roman empire collapse? This has always proved a great mystery to Latinists and other exponents of the imperial principle.

"Surely," they argue, "men in Europe could see the glory of the empire, so why did they abandon it to the ravening hordes from the North? Why in their turn did these ravening hordes not delight to prostrate themselves under the wonderful laws of the Eternal City?"

Well, all of this pro-imperial fondness is easy to profess in hindsight, especially as we have no idea what life was like for the ordinary "Johnnius Britannicus" on the Claphamus Omnibus. However, this fondness for Rome misses the essential point that given the alternative, most people in western Europe were much happier with the western Roman empire destroyed, otherwise it would have continued, as it did in the Eastern Mediterranean at Byzantium. Alas, all of our histories of this period are written by those who suffered most from the end of the western empire (i.e. the clergy of the Roman Catholic church), so we have nothing but this skewed view from history, which may remain impossible to unpick.

But what was it really like for Johnnius Britannicus, at home on his farm at the edge of Londinium?

Well, in the late period of the Roman Empire the emperors had introduced serfdom, the money was worthless bronze junk, there were endless wars into which your sons were unwillingly dragged, the taxes were horrendous as well as being taken "in kind" (because the money was worthless), which meant you were living at starvation levels much of the time, and the laws were virulent, copious, and unfathomable. Indeed, there were so many laws that if the local governor woke up in a bad mood on any particular morning it became virtually impossible for an ordinary man to go from sunrise to sunset without breaking some inane regulation he could be locked up for. (Does any of this sound familiar?)

What this cornucopia of Roman law produced was not the rule of the law, but the rule of man, because for everybody outside the magic circle of the ruling parasitical elite there was never any certainty in anything they did. If the rulers so chose on a whim, your life could be made an unendurable agony with your life, family, and property all held within the pinching fingers of this greedy aggressive claque of lawyerly politicians, tossed one way or another dependent on their clemency, spite, or otherwise, because of their mastery of these laws and their monopolistic control of the courts.

The end of this state of affairs, and the end of the western empire, must have been an absolute relief for everyone living under this yoke of endless law. Despite being a cod-latinist myself, and a fan of the original much simpler twelve tables of Roman law, I too would have been on the side of the barbarians to end this misery and quite prepared to burn these endless regulations to get to something much simpler such as the following natural law formulations:
  • You shall not instigate violence to directly harm or otherwise impede the lives of others
  • You shall not steal the life-giving property of others or trespass upon their property
  • You shall not break contracts freely entered into with others, upon which their lives may depend
  • You shall not be envious of the life-giving property of others
  • You shall not be envious of the life-enhancing relationships of other people
The five "laws" laid down above are probably as much law as most people need in their lives. Indeed, most of us live according to various versions of the five laws above, virtually all of the time. Obviously, anyone working for the state breaks all five of them all of the time, but it has taken 2,000 years of weasel-words and conniving graft to get back to this appalling state of affairs.

So how has this been done? In the same way that the Romans reached the same nadir, by the explosion of law-making brought about by the acceptance of democracy as an acceptable state of affairs.

Take for instance the latest publication of all British law, which is produced by a company called Halsbury. Every 20 years they codify all the laws of Britain. (In a court case, ignorance of these laws is no defence, which presumably means we all need to know all of them, just in case.)

So do we have five simple laws we can use in all cases? No, it is now 100 volumes of closely-packed text, which has more than doubled in size since the last time Halsbury published these codes 20 years ago.

Which means that the laws in Britain have become nothing more than empty meaningless gibberish, just as they were at the collapse of the western Roman empire. Nobody knows these laws any more, not even the editor at Halsbury. Even handsomely paid lawyers only know tiny fractions of them, and only in their own areas of speciality, which entails that the modern Johnnius Britannicus, on the broken down Clapham tube link, has absolutely no chance.

No, we don't really have laws any more. We just have regulators who "interpret" them, any way they fancy in whichever way is politically expedient at the time. You only have to look at the words "regal" or "rex", to see where all of these "regulations" or "regs" originate from; that is, from the edicts of royalty and bureaucratic kings. Even simpler is the link between the words "rulers" and "rules"; i.e., obey that which the rulers (and your betters) decree, or else it's into the ruler's gaol cage for you, peasant!

Nothing is pre-ordained (except that David Beckham will one day present "Match of the Day"). However, unless we stop it first by removing ourselves from the overlordship of politicians and their endless fascist laws, I predict that a second dark age is coming and probably sooner than we realise.

Are you ready for it, if it does?

The revolution arrives in England

I have been checking Amazon.co.uk regularly for a while now and today my target purchase item popped up for the first time. In the scrambled words of U2's Bono, I have finally found what I was looking for. Buy it. Buy two. Buy a hundred.

Monday, April 28, 2008

Re-gilding the lily

Yes, I know, another diary blog re-design. But a change is as good as a rest. And it certainly will be by the time I've figured out how to get my web page links to work again! :-)

Saturday, April 26, 2008

Dead man walking past


Anyone who has followed British politics over the last week will know that Gordon Brown (seen in the far left background of the picture above) is a dead man walking. I may even relent from pouring buckets of offal over his head for a few days, because he is such an embarrassing laughing stock. Which does of course mean that we need to start taking a closer look at the man in the right-of-centre foreground.

It's bad enough that I occasionally find myself cycling beside David Cameron on Constitution Hill or bumping into the back of his bike at the cycle lights on Hyde Park Corner. However, for Her Majesty's leader of the opposition to start stealing my train seat at the blessed Paddington station really has become too much; I may have to return to Waterloo unless he relents from this further infringement of my deep-seated wish to be left alone by politicians.

So David, if you are going to keep nicking my seat, we need to start asking you a few questions. Let's start with an easy pair of related no-brainers: How many parasites are you going to sack on day one of your premiership and how much of the resulting saved cash can I then look forward to receiving as a massive tax cut in an ongoing rolling program of further massive tax cuts?

The answers should of course be "lots" and "lots". Alas, I fear his actual answers would be more along the lines of "we'll see" and "it's more difficult than that". Which will once again prove that the end of Gordon Brown is not what we need; this will simply be the political circus spinning around once more to fool the gullible proles into believing that democratic elections actually change anything.

What we really need is the removal of all politicians, including Mr Cameron. So David, I know you eschew the wearing of a cycle helmet but think ye not that this will remove you from the protection racket frame of AngloAustrian taxation blame. Unless and until the envious and ignorant Labour Party replace Gordon Brown with that honey-tongued wretch David Milliband, you will now enjoy the dubious distinction of moving into our number one public enemy slot. Enjoy.

Sunday, April 13, 2008

A recession survival guide

Rather than bleating on endlessly about who caused the forthcoming recession, I thought now might be a good time for a survival guide, seeing as we're about to enter two years of central-bank induced hell. But there's no need for this poor aspiring Austrian scholar to try to attempt to write one. Instead, all you need to do is to read Gary North's archive of economic commentaries, particularly those of the last few months. I've picked out my recent favourites below and then tried to condense Uncle Gary's thoughts on surviving this 'temporary downturn' (Ha!): Here are his condensed recommendations for those panicking too much to read the articles above:
"This is also a time for going the extra mile for your boss. Find out what he expects and do more...You need to protect your investments against deflation...I think your first line of self-defense is your job. If you lose your job, you are in big trouble...You need to do whatever it takes to increase your value to your employer."
Then there are Uncle Gary's career plan questions to bolster the advice immediately above:
  • Is it [your career plan] consistent with recent events?
  • Is it positioned for future events?
  • Does it maximize your lifetime opportunities?
  • Does it allow you career flexibility (new career)?
  • Does it lead toward a retirement career?
  • Does it offer you enough time to build a side business?
  • Have you identified your fall-back job?
  • Have you developed a system of networking?
  • Do any potential employers know how profitable you are?
  • Does your boss know how profitable you are?
  • Does his boss know how profitable you are?
  • Are you well known within a niche segment of your industry?
  • Do you have your own website?
  • Do you have your own blog site?
Finally, with my apologies in advance, there are some big scary questions to answer:
  • How safe is your retirement portfolio from a major recession and stock market decline?
  • How much of your retirement portfolio is in dollars?
  • How much equity do you still have in your home after normal discounting and the sales commission? After recession discounting?
  • How much money do you owe on things other than your mortgage?
  • How safe is your employer's bank?
  • What would happen to your employer if the bank were to cut off your employer's normal credit line?
  • How secure is your job in a recession?
  • What are your employment opportunities locally?
  • What is your fall-back position if you get fired?
  • How long would it take you to get a job in a recession at your present salary?
  • What is the cut in salary that you could afford to take, given your present monthly budget?
  • How much could you cut your budget if you had to? How?
  • Is your wife employed?
  • How do these questions apply to her?
Personally, I'm going to run screaming to the hills. But for anyone sensible, the above recession survival guide should get most of us through, if we can face up to answering and dealing with the questions above. Good luck. See you on the other side.

Saturday, April 12, 2008

We all have to have a hobby

Mine is writing pointless comments under Daily Telegraph articles. Here's the latest article I've wasted my time posting under: The gravy train powers on - paid for by me. Did you really think I could resist a splendid article title like that? ;-)

Here's the comment, in all its mellifluous glory:
How about we ask everyone who works for the state to take an immediate six month leave of absence? If any of the rest of us notice that they're no longer working, within this six month period, plus that our lives are worse off as a result, then they can come back to work - they are all, of course, supposed to be there for our benefit. We then sack the other 85% and use the saved money to pay for them to do something useful in the private sector.
Posted by Jack Maturin on April 12, 2008 1:24 PM
If it's read by just one useless Marxoid state drone, causing them inner fury, it will have been worth the mental bit space. Pip pip!!

UPDATE: I couldn't resist it. Some tax parasite on the same thread banged on about how public sector workers pay tax. I therefore had no choice but to fire this missive:
I think Jamie 10:30 is getting a little confused about public sector workers paying any form of tax. The way to spot it is to ask the following question: If everybody stopped paying taxes of any kind tomorrow, what would the subsequent gross wages be for any full-time public sector worker? If your answer is anything above nothing, you need to think it through again and ask yourself where any state wages would come from. This accounting sleight of hand, where state workers pay nominal amounts of tax, is a really clever way of fooling the rest of us that state workers do actually pay tax. If I wasn't being robbed in the process, I would have to admire its subtlety, where even people who should know better, such as senior civil servants, swan around under the erroneous assumption that they too are taxpayers. Unconsciously however I think most state workers know they don't pay any tax. That's why they're always clamouring for the rest of us to pay more. A tax rise for the private sector is nothing more than a wage rise for the public sector. No wonder state workers are so happy to vote for tax-raising political parties. Voting for other people's money to be painlessly stolen from others and then handed to you has been a sure-fire vote winner since Roman times.
Posted by Jack Maturin on April 12, 2008 4:06 PM
Just why do we post these comments to newspaper threads? What compulsion is it? I suppose we may be under the illusory spell of thinking that the 'great published writer' who wrote the original piece may be spending their entire time reading these comment threads to be overwhelmed with the logic of our wise positions, rather than drinking heavily in a London saloon bar trying to think up the next 2,000 words. Personally, I just love causing cognitive dissonance in the odd Marxist and potentially tipping a miniscule percentage of this tiny fraction towards the ideas of freedom, by spinning awkward ideas in their minds. Well okay, I might not be George Orwell, but I do like to keep the Austrian aspidistra flying.

Nurse! The screens!

Crikey. You may have thought that I have been a bit pessimistic recently. So did I, until I read this article by Uncle Gary North.

Crivens. This 'temporary credit crunch' may be even worse than we thought.

Friday, April 11, 2008

What are we going to do now?

I must say that after my diary posting yesterday, I almost spilt my cornflakes this morning when I read the following headline in today's Torygraph: Mortgage costs rise despite Bank rate cut. Could Spike Milligan have written comedy as funny as this? It would be a close run thing.

BTW, that's Spike above in a sketch about the Bank of England's Monetary Policy Committee. He's playing Sir Mervyn King. John Bluthal (to Spike's left) is playing Alistair Darling, and David Lodge (to Spike's right, and a star of the famous British war film Cockleshell Heroes), is playing Gordon Brown.

So let's test the theory outlined above. Below I've pasted Spike's funniest ever joke. It contains all of the elements needed in a top quality joke, including anxiety, superiority, and surprise. But is it funnier than the situation behind the headline above; Mortgage costs rise despite Bank rate cut. I'll let you decide. Here we go:
Two hunters are out in the woods when one of them collapses. He doesn't seem to be breathing and his eyes are glazed. The other guy whips out his phone and calls the emergency services. He gasps, "My friend is dead! What can I do?". The operator says "Calm down. I can help. First, let's make sure he's dead." There is a silence, then a shot is heard. Back on the phone, the guy says "OK, now what?"
It's close. But then, there is a lot of it about. Pip pip!!

UPDATE: If you look to the extreme right of the photograph (to John Bluthal's left), you may also spot Sir Mervyn King himself, in a cameo role. He is of course, playing a feckless idiot.

Thursday, April 10, 2008

Government unveils secret weapon to fight financial bubble

Okay, so let's assume that I don't win any prizes for correctly guessing yesterday, that after heavy hint instructions from El Gordo on Monday, the Bank of England would cut interest rates today by another quarter per cent, to roll yet more fiat currency out the door thus impoverishing everyone in the world holding sterling.

Given the current headless chicken status of the British financial establishment, with no clue as to what is going on and with no clue as to what to do, Plan B was always going to be to print more money. It always is. Which is, of course, why we're in this mess.

But aside from ruining even more pensions, boosting inflation further, and pushing up yet more asset prices, this reflex action is simply going to make no difference to the problem it is trying to solve, as the Fed have found out with their own interest rate cuts.

If a bubble is imploding, let it implode. The necessary correction, though painful in the short-term, will be briefer if we allow it to happen and the subsequent recovery from the malinvestment caused by the bubble will be quicker. If we prick the bubble, we can then write off the losses we have sustained through wasteful malinvestments, liquidate what left overs we can from these malinvestments, and then put these capital savings to better use this time guided by stable unfettered prices. If you keep pushing out the bubble by inflating paper and thus increasing paper prices, we head directly full square towards a crack-up boom and eventually, as in Zimbabwe, a land filled with starving billionaires.

Just answer these questions, oh wise ones in the London business press. How much is petrol? How much are food bills? How much are poll tax bills? Are taxes going up? How is your wallet doing? How much are your mortgage payments? How well is your pension fund doing? How well is your endownment fund doing? How much are your school fees? What is your holiday going to cost this year? Have you ever heard of the Weimar republic? Have you ever heard of the 10 year depression in Japan? Have you ever heard of Robert Mugabe? Has the use of the printing press ever been a long-term solution to anyone, anywhere?

Printing more of this fiat paper rubbish is exactly the wrong way to go and I simply don't care how eminent you are in the finance department of your newspaper. If you believe a rate cut was a good thing, then you are wrong and you simply do not understand economics. Or, if I may be less charitable, you do understand economics but you are within the magic circle of those who benefit from increased amounts of fiat currency, which includes anyone working directly for the state, or for anyone working indirectly for the state in the City of London or the media, or someone who will get this counterfeited money first.

The state always needs an intellectual bodyguard to protect its existence, hence the state education system and the state regulated media system, and the state always needs someone to finance state borrowings via a corrupted money supply and government debt system, hence the entire UK gilt market and most of the banking system; so these people will always be looked after.

Now I know you've read Douglas Adams. And I know you laughed at the Golgafrinchams running around stuffing leaves under their shirts and calling them legal tender. Now explain to me the difference between this leaf stuffing and the Bank of England counterfeiting yet more paper currency? If you can, I would be pleased to hear your response.

With Brown's ten year boom about to go bust I'm reminded of the old Spike Milligan shows where the entire cast would look towards the camera and then start shuffling off the set under the refrain, "What are we going to do now?" As far as the UK government goes and its latest cut in interest rates performed by its useful idiots in the Bank of England, I think we have reached that Spike Milligan moment. When they publish the meeting minutes, I think between the lines the phrase "What are we going to do now?" is going to be quite prominent.

Oh well. I think that's enough from me for the moment. It must be time for a stiff gin and tonic while I can still afford one. Cheers.

Wednesday, April 09, 2008

They don't like it up 'em!

Oh dear. Don't panic!

The IMF has just predicted that UK house prices will fall 10% in the next year (following Halifax's prediction of a 5% fall, yesterday). However, Alastair Darling, the UK government's Caporegime, has just claimed that all is still well with the British economy.

Well Alastair, you may be fooling an ever-decreasing portion of the supine British electorate, but I would just love to be a fly on the wall in Downing Street at the moment. I bet the words Panic and Brown Trousers don't cover the half of it.

AngloAustria's solution? Stop the printing press. Burn the rulebook. And let the market decide.

So what will the Downing Street morons do? They're going to run the printing press faster, come up with another 1,000 pages of financial regulation nobody understands, and then blame it all on the market when this "solution" makes things even worse.

And so down the rabbit hole we continue to go...

The song that is irresistible

Following on from our earlier theme about the state being nothing more than an over-sized protection racket, in case you missed it you must read Robert Higgs's much more refined Schlarbaum Award Acceptance Speech about the same topic. It's one of those pieces that you wish you had the ability to write yourself, and in the face of which you stand in awe for its clarity and its ability to cut through to the central realities. For instance, here's the tiniest snippet:
"The state's most fundamental purpose, the activity without which it cannot even exist, is robbery. The state gains its very sustenance from robbery, which it pretties up ideologically by giving it a different name (taxation) and by striving to sanctify its intrinsic crime as permissible and socially necessary."
Bravo, Sir; it truly is a magnificent piece of writing.

UPDATE: And here is the MP3.

RIP, Charlton Heston

What a man. What a life. What an actor. All that, plus much more:
"The egalitarian world view now considered politically correct makes us uneasy with the idea that one individual is better than the rest of us. But having played several great men, I can tell you that they are better than we are ...."
Marvellous.

Tuesday, April 08, 2008

Daydream believer

The entire reign of Gordon Brown, first as chancellor and then as prime minister, has been based upon debt, and all of that debt has been based upon the daydream of ever-rising house prices, with people gouging out their own property equities to keep their noses above the ever-rising waters of Brown's stealth taxes.

Well, these cornerstone house prices were ever-rising, until today, when Halifax reported a 2%-5% drop in house prices, in March. And so now let us find out what happens when the tax man comes to the cupboard to this time find it bare; the ensuing carnage may be quite spectacular.

Ranged along one side will be the forces of the public sector demanding yet more pelf in their inflationary spiral of waste, their dreams precariously dangled over the rocks of avarice. Ranged along the other side will be the forces of the private sector finally giving up their cake-eating dreams of champagne socialism and rightfully demanding to keep what is theirs, with whatever weapons come to hand.

In the middle will be Gordon Brown clinging on by his chewed finger nails to the rapidly vanishing dream of a socialism that works in a world of scarce resources.

To paraphrase Hannibal Lecter, it's going to be quite a show.

Thursday, April 03, 2008

Vanity towns


Let’s take it as read that AngloAustria is thoroughly against the idea of government-sponsored eco-towns, of which around 10 are planned in the UK, by Gordon Brown, the forthcoming ex-prime minister. I could toss in phrases such as “Stalinist concentration camps outside the market and therefore doomed to fail”, “An appalling Swedish-style harbinger of things to come”, and other assorted anarcho-capitalist diatribes, but where would the fun be in that?

Obviously, these “eco-towns” will be a total disaster, from start to finish, making the dreadful Milton Keynes look like a sumptuous Xanadu, but think of the business opportunities! These towns will be full of people with nothing to do all day except recycle cardboard boxes, push-biked in to them by sustainable Aardvarks. Therefore, these suicidally bored mono-maniacs will be desperate to escape and get proper jobs somewhere else, though none of them will have cars so they’ll be stuck! So if you provide commuting services for them, to get to the nearest rail terminal for instance, you could clean up! (Pun thoroughly intended.)

And then, once you have made a fortune from transporting these sad miserable people out of the hell-holes of their own choosing, think of the amusement you’ll be able to have reminding them how incompatible commuting is with “sustainable environmentally friendly eco-living”.

Personally, if they build one of these Potemkin villages in my neck of the woods, I’ll be up there each weekend in an enormous hired 4x4, smoking cigars, and lecturing them all via truck-mounted loudspeaker on the evils of commuting. Picture the stone aged hatred on the faces of the inhabitants as I roll by. Imagine the fun!

But seriously, can you imagine living anywhere worse than in a green-field government eco-town? It really will be a living hell, with one hundred per cent state-employed populations of po-faced human haters living cheek-by-jowl in houses made from goats’ cheese and Peruvian muesli (canoed in by mutinous Camel).

Aside from the horrible amounts of subsidy each of these towns will suck in, until enough of the population commute away to do real work in the market place of voluntary human needs, I shall be filled with hilarity each day until the point comes where all of these appalling places become either ghost towns, vacuous “nowhere-places” like Canberra in Australia filled with nothing but government jobs, or dead commuter villages re-populated each evening by self-loathing hypocrites.

And if we do get ghost towns, think of the money we could make turning each one into a giant paint-balling venue! Fantastic.

Wednesday, April 02, 2008

More pond scum cleaned up

It's good to see yet another 'eminent' politician has been exposed as a crook. So it's goodbye, Bertie Ahern, another follower in the inglorious pickpocket Irish tradition of Charles Haughey. No doubt Ahern will get kicked up into the Crime Commission, in Brussels, but at least it's good to see he has suffered a thoroughly excellent public shaming, thus throwing all politicians into their rightful dock of constant suspicion. But here's the rub! Have you noticed that the smaller a country is (in terms of population), the more crooked the politicians seem to be?

You would have thought that "bigger" crooks would go after "bigger" countries, where there are more resources to pelf and greater powers to sell or otherwise corrupt. But it always seems to be the Australias, the Canadas, and the Irelands, where there is a greater chance of an individual tax slave rubbing shoulders with a politician, who seem more inflicted with these rats, rather than the larger "Anglo" states, such as America and Britain?

For instance, Scottish politics is full of liars, rogues, and ne'er-do-wells, whereas Scottish politicians in British Westminster politics, though equally likely to be liars, rogues, or ne'er-do-wells, seem to appear in court a lot less often.

Is this because the bigger the state, the more democracy can rein in the constant urge of politicians to reward themselves for all of their hard work in serving the rest of us?

Or is it because in bigger countries the politicians find it easier to hide their graft through greater power, lesser contact with individual tax payers, a more supine press eager to feast on juicier world news fed to them by a more influential government, and the easier opportunities to hide smaller percentages of "skim" taken off greater amounts of tax?

I'm stumped? The answer to this conundrum is simply too hard to fathom!