As I am currently engaged in a hugely complicated property deal in Greece, I have little time to write a web log. However, I have even less time to read those long articles on Cobden Centre, any more. I am much more inclined to read the new blog pieces produced by a very good friend of mine, on a new Austrian Economics web site, in England.
I cannot recommend this web site, highly enough.
Wednesday, July 13, 2011
Friday, October 08, 2010
The Maturin World Tour
I am currently engaged in an extensive world tour of all the world's finest Shiraz, Pinot, and Gewurztraminer grape wineries.
I may be some time.
In the meantime, you may like to follow England's other source of Austrian-related information:
=> The Cobden Centre
Cheers, and Pip pip!!
I may be some time.
In the meantime, you may like to follow England's other source of Austrian-related information:
=> The Cobden Centre
Cheers, and Pip pip!!
Friday, June 25, 2010
Wimbledon's longest match: John Isner victorious as marathon match finally ends
Incredible. Herculean. Magnificent.
Will there be a movie? There ought to be. Here's a YouTube, instead:
World Cup, Sunday: Germany versus England
One to watch through the fingers from behind the sofa, methinks.
Here's the YouTube of Germany and England's finest encounter:
UPDATE: AngloAustrian prediction. It will go to penalties. Slight concern this end that although England are finally practicing penalties at the end of every training session, that they are not doing the full walk from the halfway line. If Maturin Towers were coaching England, then we would do this to enable full motor memory skills to come into play during the actual game. The more you do something 'for real', and the more real you make the practice experience, then the less nerve-racking will be the real thing, when it finally happens, as the body falls into a pre-programmed neuronal motor pattern, as determined by neural linguistic programming. Oh well. What the heck do we know? Not that I'm nervous, or anything.
Are those green shoots wilting, Ben?
Ben Barnacle's money-printing game is beginning to go all a bit wobbly:
=> Ben Bernanke needs fresh monetary blitz as US recovery falters
Oh dear. How sad. Never mind.
Barack Obama is refusing to listen to reason on economic policy
I rarely cover Jeremy Warner of The CoalitionGraph, because usually he is too statist for my tastes; however, today he writes a considered piece about the growing monetary divergences between Europe and America.
He has some fine words for Paul Krugman, too:
As it happens, nobody is asking America to axe and burn with immediate effect, though you might not think this to read Professor Krugman's ever more hysterical commentaries on the fiscal austerity sweeping Europe. But some sort of a plan for long-term debt reduction, other than blind reliance on growth, might be helpful.Is the tide changing on Keynesianism? It's certainly coming in less quickly if it hasn't quite turned yet.
There is hope, after all.
Thursday, June 24, 2010
Bernanke: "I Don't Understand the Gold Price"
Ben Bernanke is either stupid or he is lying.
He may think we're idiots, which makes him an idiot, but I don't think he's stupid.
So he's almost certainly just lying.
He may think we're idiots, which makes him an idiot, but I don't think he's stupid.
So he's almost certainly just lying.
Keynesian policies have brought Britain to the brink of ruin
Professor Kevin Dowd maps out the hole that Gordon Brown and the other Keynesians have put us in:
In 1930, Maynard Keynes wrote a splendid essay (”Economic Possibilities for our Grandchildren“) in which he looked forward 100 years hence. His musings did not age well: he anticipated that by then the economic problem – endless toil – would be resolved and we would be working 3 hour days to keep our hand in as it were, and he worried about the effects of so much leisure time and boredom on our mental health. This was the same genius who told us the government should spend its way out of recession and that in the long run we were all dead anyway.
How Libertarians Should Live in a State-Run World
Thank goodness for Uncle Murray, for helping us to understand how to remain sane in a world of statist madness.
Just to add to his thoughts, some of us occasionally encounter the argument from statists that the state 'owns' the country we live in, and that if we don't like the state's rules, then we have three choices; (1) Leave - though this is often either difficult or impossible and there's nowhere left in the world anyway, which isn't in the clutches of some state, or which one state or another won't rule out from invading at its own will, so that even your own ship in international waters can be invaded by a state in hostile violent mode with the statist press defending them for their heroic actions; (2) Stop complaining, and buckle under; (3) Commit suicide.
Well, I feel that the state 'owns' its own territory in the same way that a Mafia mob 'owns' its bit of turf in Manhattan. Yes, some of these mafias have 'ruled' their bit of turf for a long time, but that doesn't make it any better or any more morally legitimate when they 'ask' you for protection taxes. In fact, so weak is their position on their original 'ownership' of a territory, that states usually turn to some deity or other to justify their possession of a controlled territory in which they run a monopoly on forced payments in return for monopoly 'protection' provision.
A case in point is the British government. Duke William of Normandy got the distant Pope of the day to give him 'permission' (presumably on behalf of the Christian God) to invade England. Even today the flag of England, the bloody cross of Christ, is that same papal emblem, the Vexillum Ecclesiae, which William carried into battle with him at Hastings after it was sent to him by Pope Alexander II.
It does seem rather ironic, of course, that the same flag that millions of Englishmen are draping themselves in as they watch the World Cup, is the same flag that was used to wrap them in chains; it must be some kind of Stockholm syndrome writ large. But I digress.
Having decapitated the previous regime, William then took over England, slaughtering, taxing, and regulating, as he went, handing over massive parcels of stolen land to his lieutenants, keeping the best lands for himself. Oh, and while he was at it, he got his state-appointed judges to declare that he did in fact own all the land he could see (and much land that he couldn't see), and that all of these grants of land to the Dukes of Northumberland, Montgomery, Norfolk, et al, could all be revoked at the King's pleasure.
To this day, the Queen of England still 'owns' every square inch of land in England, by right of conquest emanating directly from William. It is at her blessing that the 'freehold' you may possess underlying your English castle is not revoked back to her, at her discretion. Hence, the British government can legally (under the British state's common law ruled upon by British state judges who work for and who swear allegiance to the crown) put a motorway through your back garden, should they so choose to do so, at any time, and if you die without any heirs, then 'your' land goes back to the crown.
But William was a murdering raping bandit. And although it has admittedly been a long time since his band of robbers decided to swing by England and settle down, cataloguing the people as tax cattle in the Doomsday Book, this time effect does not make the English crown's 'ownership' of England any more legitimate. Just as the Romans were not the legitimate 'owners' of Britain by conquest when they raped this land, or just as the EU - the modern descendant of the Roman Empire - is not now the current legitimate 'owner' of Britain, because the crown's ministers signed us over to them in the Lisbon treaty; we weren't theirs to give away in the first place, as they are basing this right to hand us over on the right of conquest a thousand years ago, which was a criminal act.
In the same way, the US government does not 'own' the Moon, just because they planted a few flags there, paid for with stolen money, and does not own virtually the entire western half of continental America because Jefferson used stolen money to buy a piece of paper from a corrupt French government, in the Louisiana purchase, covering millions of acres of land no Frenchman had ever seen, let alone any King called Louis.
Forget John Locke and mixing your labour with previously unowned land. Buying everything from a bankrupt French King, from the Mississippi to the Pacific, without any European having seen much of it, with money stolen from the American people, is a neat trick if you can get away with it; I wonder how the native American peoples who occupied the land at the time thought about this? Let's face it; they probably didn't even know about this piece of paper going from one white man to another for fifty years, until some more white men turned up in their village with guns to shoot them up, one day, while waving this grubby piece of paper as justification for the slaughter.
But just supposing for a second that we accept that the British state does 'own' Britain. Does that mean we must knuckle under and obey, tug our forelocks, and pay our taxes? Of course it doesn't.
If you are in a prison for a crime you didn't commit, or even if you have just been captured as an enemy combatant by some repulsive state or other, or even if you have been locked up just for disagreeing with the powers-that-be, then as far as I am concerned you are at perfect liberty to try to escape or to make the life of the guards as much hell as possible, or to burn down the prison camp to replace it with a better place, just as you would be if you were born in the Soviet Gulag, the biggest prison camp of all time.
The prisons the state has built to house us as tax cattle may be 'owned' by them. But the land they built these prisons on was stolen and the money they used to purchase the bricks and cement of the prison, and to pay the guards with, was stolen; often from us!
Everything the state builds and owns was done through either theft or violence, or both. Therefore, it can never be 'legitimate' if you believe in a system of morals in which theft and initiated violence are repulsive. Thou shalt not steal is at the bedrock of every form of law in the world; it doesn't become okay just because you call yourself a state rather than a gang.
The state is nothing but an immoral band of robbers writ large. And it should be treated as such.
Is the world's supply of oil virtually inexhaustible?
Crazy stuff from an Austrian physicist named Gold.
Or is it crazy?
I hope no-one tells the Mogambo Guru. His oil futures may be worth less than he thought.
England Slay the Mighty Slovenia
Yes, once more into the breach, the David of England slayed the mighty Goliath of Slovenia by one incredible stone's-throw goal to nil.
I am now going to bet my house, my shirt, and my farm, on England beating Germany, Brazil, Spain, and Argentina, in that order, to win the World Cup!
I believe.
Where is Slovenia, BTW?
Wednesday, June 23, 2010
Beware of Mr. Wolf
Dear God, it's more densely packed than the matter in a neutrino star, but Sean Corrigan's demolition of the Keynesian position is both intense and wonderful, like a seared bloody Aberdeen Angus steak drenched in hot fresh Puttanesca sauce.
Brilliant!
Tuesday, June 22, 2010
Vuvuzelen sind verboten
Adolf gets himself in a sauerkraut pickle over the nine-year-old South African cultural implement:
You don't get this kind of service on LewRockwell.com! :-)
You don't get this kind of service on LewRockwell.com! :-)
Gold reclaims its currency status as the global system unravels
Ambrose finally spots the Austrian elephant in the room.Look out for the interesting comments at the bottom, BTW.
I haven't left one myself; I was simply too busy laughing! :-)
Monday, June 21, 2010
Stand by your wallets
Tomorrow morning, that economic klutz George Osborne is going to attempt to empty your wallet to make you pay for the British government's mistakes, to ensure that British government staff don't have to suffer for these mistakes and to make sure that you bear the cost of all of this jobbery.
Osborne's plan won't work, of course, and they'll still end up printing their way out of this, rather than daring to take a real axe to all of that spending above their means.
So when the recession comes back again, for Part II, after its rest while the Keynesian stimulus was tried, we'll really know how George's desperate plan has done.
It ain't gonna be pretty.
Make sure you get a good accountant. Avoid as much of this theft as you can. Spend what you can save on physical gold and store it in such a way that the British government cannot steal it from you when they get really desperate in a few years' time.
Uncle Gary's 101 on Keynesianism
Crikey.
That Uncle Gary's a card, and no mistake.
Just check out this 101 on why the US economy is in such a mess.
Try seeing if you can get through the whole thing without taking more than one breath:
=> 101 Thoughts on America's Economy
'How to save the NHS £12bn in one year without stopping a single operation'
The blue-rinse socialists at ConservativeHome have a central plan to improve the governmental efficiency of the NHS.
Yes folks, they really don't get it at all.
Here's my pointless response which no-one will read, and even if they do, completely ignore, but it does make me feel better to know that at least they have seen a glimpse of the truth, even if they are incapable of understanding it:
Jack Maturin said...UPDATE: Oh dear, I have upset the controllers of the memory hole. My comment has been deleted by the bed-wetting blue-rinse socialists of ConservativeHome. What a miserable bunch of feeble and pathetic cowards. No doubt there'll be some technical reason for this. It will have nothing to do with daring to mention the taboo phrase of 'the free market' in relation to the NHS.
I hate to sound too radical, ConservativeHome, but none of the measures you have outlined will work. The tens of thousands of overpaid bureaucrats who would administer any such cuts are far too well buried and camouflaged to be outed by such measures, and they are the ones who make the decisions anyway.
If the central government tries to cut down these useless people, these rent-seekers will sack doctors, nurses, and ambulance drivers instead, to cover their own tracks and to deliberately create a crisis, in which they will keep their bloated pensions and salaries, and all the palaces that they work in (often located in leafy grounds well away from the dreadful hospitals they use as excuses to rape the taxpayer).
The central state cannot do anything about these people. It appointed them and it pays them to make the decisions on the ground. These people will always choose themselves first, seeing as they are human beings (though largely immoral ones).
Central planning, can never work. It has never worked. And it will never work, even if the central plan is to cut spending. The Men from the Ministry only ever ending up cutting what is useful and keeping what is useless.
There is only one answer. And until it is tried, we will never be rid of 'Save Our Hospital' campaigns, and the like, and a wasteful inefficient system which prefers people dying within its bowels to cut down on bed usage, with 'death committees' (e.g. NICE) deciding who lives and who dies on the basis of political influence.
What is this radical answer? I don't know whether I dare whisper its horrific name.
Privatise the whole shooting match.
It's heady stuff, I know, but can you imagine (even for a second) a 'Save Our Hospital' campaign, if the whole thing was privatised? Do we have 'Save Our Supermarket' campaigns in the much more private food-provision market? Can you just imagine how terrible a 'National Food Service' would be, if the government put the same level of central control into food provision as it does into health service provision? We would first starve and then there would be a revolution.
Why do we put up with this miserable government control in the health system then? Because you do not die within weeks if the government controls the health system, as you would if they controlled the food system, that's why. And so we don't notice just how bad they are at managing it. Instead, we die years earlier than we should, usually in miserable conditions.
And I don't mean American-style privatisation either, which is massive government control and spending fronted by privileged 'private' front organisations, and run by a union, the American Medical Association, to keep doctors rich and patients poor.
I mean full-blown complete removal of government interference in the health market completely. Everything government touches it turns to dust. The more government involvement you have, the worse things get. The less government involvement you have, the better things get.
You chaps may have heard of this radical solution before.
It's called the 'free market'.
Or are you blue-rinse socialists still too afraid to dare say its name?
The system wasn't even broken before the Labour party created the NHS monster, based upon the soviet system. There was a slight shortage in arthritis treatment services, and that was it.
The entire nationalisation was a political scam to try to socialise the people into politically correct thinking. They wanted to make it literally unthinkable, in the Orwellian sense, for people to dare to remove their socialist controls.
It would appear that this scam worked.
No wonder I left the Tory party.
HT to Archie Dean
UPDATEII: After Archie D. pointed out that my initial comment had been deleted, I left the following hilarious rejoinder which I fully expected to be deleted too.
Jack Maturin said...Remarkably enough, it wasn't deleted! Instead, my original comment popped back up again. Crazy.
Oh dear, Blue Beep, it appears you don't like it up you. What a terrible shame.
I was right then. You really are a bunch of bed-wetting blue-rinse socialists.
Even better than that, some nitwit called Allan had decided to tear a strip off me by accusing me of believing in the free market.
Well, duh?! :-)
I won't bother boring you with his witless pathetic reply. Here's my rejoinder, instead:
Jack Maturin said in reply to Allan...That should raise his blood pressure a bit. If he goes down the NHS, I suppose they'll treat it for him with a life-long treatment of expensive Big Pharma drugs.
So Allan, you believe that the market fails and must be bolstered by socialised government interventions. In the old days, this would have meant that you were a SOCIALIST. I suppose nowadays it means that you're a 'radical conservative'.
Why are such radical conservatives so terrified of the free market?
Why does the free market have to be defended from attacks by these radical conservatives?
I'm not even going to try, as it's pointless. You either believe in the free market or you do not. You either believe that the free market can deliver ALL services better than socialised government or you do not. No amount of argument ever made a single socialist give up socialism, with extremely rare exceptions such as Hayek.
But Allan, please do not think that you are NOT a socialist. Everyone who 'believes' in the NHS is a socialist. Just as everyone who 'believes' in the BBC is a socialist. And everyone who believes in subsidies for farmers is a socialist.
Your pet groups as to who gets subsidies forced out of others may differ from those of the Labour party or the Liberal party, but it's a question of degree, not of substance. If you want socialised systems of service provision then you are a socialist.
That's what the word means. Look it up in a dictionary:
so·cial·ist (ssh-lst)
n.
1. An advocate of socialism.
so·cial·ism (ssh-lzm)
n.
1. Any of various theories or systems of social organization in which the means of producing and distributing goods is owned collectively or by a centralized government that often plans and controls the economy.
Now please define the NHS in a way which isn't trapped by that definition above? I would be fascinated to see how you do it.
Please enjoy the rest of your socialist life.
Peter Schiff Roundup
The Duke is worried about the signs for business in the US of 'political risk', and how Barry Ocuda may use the BP situation to ram through more communism:
The Duke then discusses a new article by Ally Greenfin and the appreciation of the Sinopian's currrency:
The Duke then discusses a new article by Ally Greenfin and the appreciation of the Sinopian's currrency:
Labour's legacy is a choice between unpleasant cuts in public spending, a sovereign debt crisis or currency debasement
Steve Baker, the Misesian MP for Wycombe, writes the finest exposition on real (i.e. Austrian) economics, that I have ever read.And yes, I'm including Rothbard and Hoppe in that.
It would seem that Ursula really does appear to have found our very own English Dr. No:
"The Government does not have an inexhaustible horn of plenty. Government has nothing to give without first taking. Government funds itself by taking today, by borrowing against a promise to take a greater sum tomorrow and by debasing the currency. We have reached the limits of all three."
Sunday, June 20, 2010
We're all Prussian Now - Why Schools Really Exist
We have likened schools to Nazi prisons before, here on AngloAustria, but nobody puts this argument better than John Gatto, the former high school teacher from New York state. Here are his six reasons why schools, particularly state schools, exist, and no peeps, it's not to educate people. In fact, it's the very opposite:1) The adjustive or adaptive function. Schools are to establish fixed habits of reaction to authority. This, of course, precludes critical judgment completely. It also pretty much destroys the idea that useful or interesting material should be taught, because you can't test for reflexive obedience until you know whether you can make kids learn, and do, foolish and boring things.As Murray Rothbard reveals in his brilliant Conceived in Liberty, the state school system in the United States sprang directly from the theocracy of Massachusetts and its need to make children obey the theocrats. The rigid Christian theocrats in Massachusetts copied this school system directly from Prussia, where it was used to make children obey the Prussian state, the same state which eventually became the Third Reich national socialist state.
2) The integrating function. This might well be called "the conformity function," because its intention is to make children as alike as possible. People who conform are predictable, and this is of great use to those who wish to harness and manipulate a large labor force.
3) The diagnostic and directive function. School is meant to determine each student's proper social role. This is done by logging evidence mathematically and anecdotally on cumulative records. As in "your permanent record." Yes, you do have one.
4) The differentiating function. Once their social role has been "diagnosed," children are to be sorted by role and trained only so far as their destination in the social machine merits - and not one step further. So much for making kids their personal best.
5) The selective function. This refers not to human choice at all but to Darwin's theory of natural selection as applied to what he called "the favored races." In short, the idea is to help things along by consciously attempting to improve the breeding stock. Schools are meant to tag the unfit - with poor grades, remedial placement, and other punishments - clearly enough that their peers will accept them as inferior and effectively bar them from the reproductive sweepstakes. That's what all those little humiliations from first grade onward were intended to do: wash the dirt down the drain.
6) The propaedeutic function. The societal system implied by these rules will require an elite group of caretakers. To that end, a small fraction of the kids will quietly be taught how to manage this continuing project, how to watch over and control a population deliberately dumbed down and declawed in order that government might proceed unchallenged and corporations might never want for obedient labor.
So now you know why Massachusetts 'liberals' are so like Nazis.
Subsequently, we in Britain copied the 'progressive' American schools system. So now you also know why Gordon Brown used to like visiting Massachusetts for his 'political inspirations' before he became Chancellor and really screwed this country over. (And no, it was nothing to do at all with visiting Provincetown, and its famous gay colony on the seminal tip of the phallic Cape Cod. Because Gordon Brown isn't gay. Oh no. He's a happily married man.)
Saturday, June 19, 2010
England unlikely to win World Cup, shock
In what must have been the most tortuous game of soccer I think I have ever had the displeasure of witnessing, at least since the last World Cup, the England team once again failed to perform despite being filled by some of the alleged best soccer players, in the world. (You have to say that last bit like Jeremy Clarkson.)
These world-class players are very lucky in that they can still rescue the situation by beating Slovenia in their final group game, but I wouldn't bet my house on it.
Oh well, there's always 2014.
It seems that the expensive Capello magic has stopped working. Has he fallen for the old England manager trap of refusing to do the obvious thing (i.e pairing Rooney with Gerrard, removing Heskey, and bringing on Joe Cole from the left)? Or is he incapable of doing anything except 4-4-2? Hmmm....
There's obviously something very wrong in the heart of the England camp.
One wag I was with last night said, 'all they need is a goal, that's all I'm looking for.'
Personally, I'd be happy with a completed pass from midfield.
Shocking.
I think, however, that there's one thing for certain. Despite even Henley On Thames being festooned with cars bearing England flags, if England do win this year's World Cup, then the greatest miracle on Earth will have occurred since Moses split the waters of the Red Sea.
Don't, in other words, hold your breath.
No wonder I prefer rugby.
Friday, June 18, 2010
ECB must buy 'hundred of billions' of bonds to tame Europe's debt crisis
It's not the criminality of the ECB counterfeiters robbing wealth from the billions of people who hold euros which most sickens me, it is the corruption of language.
When Fitch Ratings say the ECB must purchase hundreds of millions of euros, it is a desecration of the word purchase, which implies that you are swapping some asset of value for another asset of value.
Whereas what the ECB is actually doing is moving a digital number from one computer memory slot to another, and in return getting enhanced promises from governments to rob their victims for the next few decades, via government bond repayments, and diluting the savings of these same victims by handing their wealth to the government via this electronic chicanery and its generation of currency handed to these miserable governments.
The whole thing is bizarre, and as Toby Baxendale notes at the Cobden Centre, these thieves only get away with this robbery because very few of these government victims know how the monetary system operates. If they did, then there would be instant revolution; which is why the process is kept so shrouded by the corruption of language itself.
So how does a corrupt entity, the EU state, bail itself out? I have no clue.
Let's change that headline to what it should really say:
'ECB must inflate the paper currency stock by printing up hundreds of billions of more new euro currency tickets'
Most people would still not realise what lay behind that, in the way that they have been fooled by 'quantitative easing', but if we are to even start tackling these swindlers, we must start using language truthfully and picking up on it where it is used dishonestly.
Though having said that, I'm sure the odd politician does occasionally tell the odd word of truth. But only by mistake.
Wednesday, June 16, 2010
Doug Casey Revisits the Greater Depression and Explains the Realities of Investing in the 21st Century
Worth reading every word, from The Guvnor, to protect yourself from the damage your stupid government is going to inflict upon you in order to protect its own future:
"The Greater Depression began, I believe, in 2007, and will get much worse because not just the US government, but every major government in the world, has been doing not just the wrong things but exactly the opposite of the right things.
The right thing would be for these governments to get totally out of the picture. What they are doing instead is inserting themselves further into the economy. But I suppose this is what the average person wants them to do because, idiotically, the average person thinks that the government is some kind of a magic cornucopia and is the solution to their problems – when actually government is the basic cause of all these problems. Its only products are taxes, regulations, and inflation – along with wars, pogroms, persecutions and the like. Government produces nothing. So I guess I'm not overly sympathetic to them; they are pretty much going to get what they deserve in the years to come.
The Greater Depression is on a temporary hiatus at the moment because the stimulus measures and extra debt these governments have created to deal with the crisis have given the appearance of a recovery; but in the months to come, things are going to devolve back to the financial chaos of a year or two ago and actually get much, much worse. I hate to make such a gloomy forecast, if only because people that draw wacky conclusions from sources like Nostradamus, the Bible, and the Mayan calendar are so prone to do so. But I'm not talking about the end of the world, just a bit of a social and economic upheaval – and we've had plenty of those over the centuries.
So, in brief, we're kind of in the eye of the storm at the moment, but I expect this thing is going to be much worse on the other side of the hurricane. And it's not going to be brief; this could linger on for years with a lot of consequences, not just the obvious economic and financial ones."
The Duke: Markets, Ron Paul, Rubini, BP
The Duke predicts an explosive movement upward in the oil price, as well as talking about gold and other investments:
Euro Declines on a Sea of Bankruptcy and Paper Promises
Oh dear. How sad. Never mind.
The Mogambo Guru explores the infinite stupidity of everybody.
Which is a neat trick, if you can do it.
The Correlation Between Morons and Government Debt
There's only one sentient being alive who could come up with an article title like that.Yep, it's that Mogambo Guru, describing his new Mogambo 55-Year Cycle Theory (M55YCT), which he just made up.
But it sounds convincing! ;-)
Britain goes to cock, shock
It's all falling apart over here in England. Even Sir Bufton Huffchester is now saying that we should shrink government by increasing taxes.
If even Sir Huff has lost his sanity, then we really are in trouble.
I would comment on all of the related articles, but alas I have work to do to help protect myself from this mess, and there's simply too much madness around at the moment to comment constructively upon it:
=> A programme to horrify politicians, but save Britain (Sir Huff finally loses it and claims that by taxing food and by increasing all other taxes, that we can get a smaller government. Go figure, as the Americans say.)
=> UK faces life in the economic slow lane (Jeremy Warner thinks we can get 'growth' in Britain by "countering" fiscal contraction with an accommodative monetary policy. My tailor is good at stuff like that. "Yes sir, if we widen your waistband your diet will start working.")
=> The critical point for peak inflation is drawing nearer, believe it or not (Roger Bootle is mystified by the visitation of price inflation upon us, from outer space. Go carefully there, Roger.)
Like I said, madness has descended.
We're not all Keynesians now.
We're all nutters.
If even Sir Huff has lost his sanity, then we really are in trouble.
I would comment on all of the related articles, but alas I have work to do to help protect myself from this mess, and there's simply too much madness around at the moment to comment constructively upon it:
=> A programme to horrify politicians, but save Britain (Sir Huff finally loses it and claims that by taxing food and by increasing all other taxes, that we can get a smaller government. Go figure, as the Americans say.)
=> UK faces life in the economic slow lane (Jeremy Warner thinks we can get 'growth' in Britain by "countering" fiscal contraction with an accommodative monetary policy. My tailor is good at stuff like that. "Yes sir, if we widen your waistband your diet will start working.")
=> The critical point for peak inflation is drawing nearer, believe it or not (Roger Bootle is mystified by the visitation of price inflation upon us, from outer space. Go carefully there, Roger.)
Like I said, madness has descended.
We're not all Keynesians now.
We're all nutters.
Sunday, June 13, 2010
An Austrian Speech in a British Parliament
Tremendous work, by Mr Baker, above, in slipping Austrianism into the British government's parliament building.
Unless you want to hear about the beauty of the Hambledon Valley and Wycombe Hospital, zip through to four minutes for the real action.
(BTW, the Hambledon Valley is about four minutes' drive from Maturin Towers, and both of our regular viewers will know exactly what it looks like if they've ever seen the film, Chitty Chitty Bang Bang.)
Time for the home brew kits to come out of the cupboard
This useless current British government is going to hammer the public with increased consumption taxes in the forthcoming Osborne budget.
What Osborne and his crew haven't realised yet, alas, is that every penny spent by government is a wasted penny and that the best way of tackling government over-spending is not by taxing more, but by spending less.
This way, they leave more wealth in the pockets of the people which will then be spent wisely on the optimum blend of production and consumption rather than all wasted on more government consumption rubbish, such as paying the grossly inflated salaries of the hundreds (perhaps thousands) of useless public sector drones who earn more than the prime minister.
They also haven't learnt Arthur Laffer's insight that if government's raise taxes sufficiently, then they raise less revenue as people work less and/or avoid the taxes. From my 'Imagined Minarchist' standpoint, there is a sweet spot of tax rates which generates the most amount of revenue.
But we are way past that point already, after 13 years of Gordon Brown (remember him?), and all more taxes will do is to depress government revenue even more, as people consume less alcohol, get more crates of booze in from France, drink cheaper drinks at home rather than in the pubs, and dust off their old home brew kits. The Treasury found that when they raised tobacco taxes sufficiently, their rake off plunged dramatically as people gave up smoking and/or shipped in crates of tobacco products from France.
The cheapest cigarettes come from Dubai, where no tax is paid on tobacco, and you often see people coming back from there with the maximum tobacco allowance, even if you never see them actually smoking them.
I wonder what's going on there?
An old Saudi hand also told me recently how to keep a continuous supply of lager going with a minimal amount of equipment and effort, and I may be following his advice in order to cut down the amount of money I waste on propping up this useless government with alcohol taxes.
With my 'Fully Realised Anarchist' hat on, of course, I feel it is a total disgusting outrage that I pay any protection racket fees at all to these criminals, but they do have guns and they are prepared to use them so the two bottle fridge trick may be an easier way to get back at these scum Westminster politicians, and other low life.
Who I feel really sorry for are the publicans and innkeepers of this land. The Nanny-State smoking ban hammered thousands of them out of work, and this proposed ravenous tax hike on alcohol is going to hammer thousands more of them out of work.
All they were doing was providing people with enjoyment and entertainment. But all this must be sacrificed so that fat useless pigs in NHS trusts and legions of other parasites can continue to receive vast salaries and pensions for producing bugger all except misery and red tape.
Roll on the revolution, brothers and sisters.
Let's round up all of these muppets and put them all on a one-way boat to Sweden.
Saturday, June 12, 2010
Friday, June 11, 2010
Peter Schiff: Markets, Bernanke, Rule of Law
The Duke's financial roundup of the week, including his use of Ben Barnacle as a contrarian indicator:
Good news on The Duke's bid to get on the Republican ballot in Connecticut:
Good news on The Duke's bid to get on the Republican ballot in Connecticut:
The Property And Freedom Society — Reflections After Five Years
Professor Hoppe explains the roots of his Property and Freedom Society:
"On the other hand, negatively, it was to unmask the State and showcase it for what it really is: an institution run by gangs of murderers, plunderers and thieves, surrounded by willing executioners, propagandists, sycophants, crooks, liars, clowns, charlatans, dupes and useful idiots—an institution that dirties and taints everything it touches."
On so-called "insta-books" and their alleged faults
Another review of Meltdown, this time at Samizdata.What? You haven't got a copy yet?
Tish, tish.
UPDATE: Here's some more thoughts from Mr Pearce, about Meltdown:
=> War did not "solve" the Great Depression
CGT: investors rush into gold coins to beat tax rise
It might be best to wait until Osborne announces his CGT plans and then waiting for the next major gold dip before trying to acquire any more physical sovereigns, as it's all gone manic. No wonder spreads are up so much.Anthony Baird, managing director of gold dealer Baird & Co, said the company could not deliver any Britannia coins until August because of lack of supply.In the meantime, get the other bullion coins and get them safely offshore. You won't need to pay CGT to the British government on these offshore coins once you ship out permanently to Thailand.
What's really awful, of course, is that you never make 'capital' on gold, so why the hell should you pay any tax. What is happening is that paper currency rubbish is devaluing against gold money, not the other way around.
Oh well. As long as the men who reserve the right to themselves to hold guns disagree with that, do what you safely can to avoid them stealing your wealth through inflation, taxation, and regulation.
Nick Clegg’s wife lands lucrative job on board of Spanish building firm
Nick Clegg's wife has secured a lucrative job on the board of directors of a Spanish construction firm which has held contracts in the United Kingdom.So, no chance of corruption or conflict of interest there, then.
Miriam Gonzalez Durantez, a Spanish born, high-flying lawyer, will act as an independent adviser to Acciona, the world’s largest provider of wind farms.
I'm sure they hired her for her objective brilliance. Just as I'm sure JP Morgan hired Tony Blair for his erudite mind.
Cobden Centre Annual Lecture 2010 – honest money and the national debt
I was going to write a post about Toby Baxendale's excellent annual lecture at the Cobden Centre, on Wednesday evening, but as I was sitting right next to the man who has already written the definitive review, I'll let Mr Tom Burroughes take up the slack instead.
(Both of our regular Maturin Towers readers will also be pleased to know that I was first to the bar, afterwards, to keep up tradition.)
The scary truth about your banks and your savings
Edmund Conway, of the CoalitionGraph's parish, is following the Cobden Centre.
Incredible.
Well done Toby Baxendale, England's leading Austrian.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)